“No word matters. But man forgets reality and remembers words”.
– Roger Zelazny, Lord of Light
Having learnt a bit of semiotics previously,
concepts like sign, code, denotation or connotation were familiar to me.
However, this course made us think about the effects of the interpretation of
signs; how signs configure our reality and how we read reality.
Before starting the class, we were asked to identify as many signs as possible inside the classroom. Some things were easy: the emergency exit sign, the pilot that indicates the computer is on, the posters on the wall… But a classmate made a very interesting point: our clothes, our hairstyle, our movements tell other people how we are. We are walking signs.
Semiotics for
beginners
Semiotics is, in short, the study of signs. A
sign is the basic unit of meaning (for example, a letter), and a code is a system
needed to interpret a sign (for example, a language). Signs have two levels: a
signifier (the form of the sign) and a signified (the concept it represents).
We need signs and codes to communicate, and we
automatically look for a meaning in everything we see or hear. But the
naturalness with which we interpret signs often makes us not be conscious of
that process of interpretation and start to think signs are reality. That’s
where semiotics comes into the scene. David Chandler, lecturer in media studies at Aberystwyth
University, explains in Semiotics for Beginners that semioticians –coming from fields like art, literature, anthropology
and mass media– study aspects such as the relation of elements to each other, the
significance that receivers attach to the signs within a text or the system of
rules governing media texts.
For Chandler, the importance of semiotics
relies on its capacity to help us understand that reality is not objective and
independent of our interpretation. Reality is constructed and interpreted by
us, humans, when we construct a message using certain signs and a certain
medium and when we interpret other messages. We are the creators of meaning.
"La trahison des images (Ceci n'est pas une pipe)", René Magritte. Source: https://museumexhibitions.wordpress.com/tag/the-lovers/ |
Everything is a sign
As has been said before, we look for a meaning
in everything we’re exposed to, we always try to understand the world around
us. Therefore, what can be considered a sign? Anything that we interpret as
having a meaning. It can be a denotative meaning, something objective that we
all agree on. For example, we can say that red is a colour in our visible
spectrum that has a wavelength of approximately 650 nm. Or we can interpret a
denotative meaning, and say that the colour red represents love and passion, or
blood and violence.
When interpreting signs, we create various
levels of significance. A signifier and a signified create a sign (blue in the
image below). That sign has a denotative meaning (green), that at the same time
becomes a signifier of a greater meaning: connotation (yellow).
Diagram of connotation and denotation. Source: http://www.indiana.edu/~slavicgf/e103/class/2011_03_21/03_21.htm |
It’s important to note, though, that signs are
arbitrary. There’s nothing in the word ‘cat’ that automatically makes it the verbal
representation of the animal. We simply agree that those three letters
represent, in the English language, this domestic feline; we construct that
verbal reality.
From the sign to the
myth
But we don’t always interpret signs
individually. Often we see groups of signs that are related to each other or that
invoke each other, because of our cultural context. Those groups of signs are
called paradigms. For example: soft, furry, small, independent, whiskers, paws…
could be the paradigm of a cat.
When paradigms are repeated over and over again
(in media, in society…) we might take them as reality. It’s not uncommon to
link womanhood with concepts like beauty, delicateness, sensuality and
quietness; or link manhood with strength, toughness, leadership, and action. But
again, paradigms, just like signs, are not the reality, they’re constructed.
Some paradigms are so often told that they
become myths. A pipe, a magnifying glass, a deerstalker cap, a violin… Do these
elements sound familiar? Those signs are part of the myth of Sherlock Holmes.
Black round ears, red pants, big yellow shoes? That would be Mickey Mouse.
Myths are part of our culture and part of our reality. In fact, they’re so
easily recognizable that they’re a common resource for marketing and media. But
it’s important to remember that we are the ones with the power to create a myth
out of only a bunch of signs.
Mickey Mouse as Sherlock Holmes. Source: http://wondersofdisney.yolasite.com/mickdetective.php |
No comments:
Post a Comment