"Of all of our inventions for mass communication, pictures still speak the most universally understood language".
– Walt Disney
Communication theories
What’s
communication? That might seem quite a tricky question to start a class with.
But actually the answer turns out to be intuitive and simple: communication is
the practice of exchanging information and meaning across space
and time using various means. Communication is not exclusive to humans,
although what defines human communication is the ability to use verbal
expression.
Through
history, there have been different models that tried to explain the communication
process. The first one was made by Shannon and Weaver in 1948 and applied mathematical
tools to explain telephonic communication.
Shannon-Weaver’s model of communication. Source: communicationtheory.org |
Since
then several different models have been designed, each one incorporating new
elements or approaches. The most important additions were made by Lasswell
(1948) and Jakobson (1963). On the one hand, Lasswell paid attention to the
effect of the communication: in any communication act, there are some
consequences that can be expected, but there might also be some unexpected
effects. On the other hand, Jakobson included the context in his model: the
interpretation of a discourse will depend on the time, place and culture where
the communication takes place.
Lasswell’s model of communication. Source: comindwork.com |
Jakobson’s model of communication. Source: communicationtheory.org |
Therefore,
communication theories nowadays study several aspects (the subjects of
communication, its functions and purposes, the different channels, languages
and codes used and the expected and unexpected consequences) in an attempt to conceptualise
the relationship between the media and audiences and to understand the nature
and extent of media influence.
Studies
on Communication are often wrongly considered less relevant than other social
sciences, probably because Communication Sciences were born more recently. But it’s
easy to see how communication and media are an important part of anyone’s
everyday life. Media influences and shapes society and vice versa, and thus understanding
that relationship is an important mean to understand society.
Communication
theories are strongly influenced by intellectual models, and the approach will
vary from a theory to another: media-centric or society-centric, culturalist or
materialist. To summarize, the different communication theories can be classified
in 3 main traditions:
- Structural approach: studies media systems and organizations and their relationships to society. It’s society-centric.
- Behavioural approach: pays attention to how humans choose, process and respond to communication messages. It’s media-centric.
- Cultural approach: analyses the meanings of particular contents. It’s also media-centric.
Evolution of communication
In
the history of communication, there have been several advances and inventions
that have changed and improved our ability to communicate:
- Pre-verbal era
- Speech (100.000 BCE)
- Symbols (30.000 BCE)
- Pictograms (5.000 BCE)
- Writing (3.200 BCE)
- Print – movable type (c. 1440 CE)
- Photography (1827)
- Telephone (1876)
- Radio (1894)
- Television (invented in 1930s / commercialized in 1950s)
- Internet (1994)
- Writing: for allowing people to communicate without being tied to a certain space and time, and for the opportunity to preserve discourses.
- Internet: for being a multimedia medium; and for allowing easy, rapid and cheap access to information and communication from all around the world.
- Print (movable type): for enabling serial printing, without having to manually copy the text and images over and over again.
- Photography: for the chance to actually show a part of reality and not just talk about it; and for being the precursor of cinema.
- Radio & Telephone. Radio: for being the first mass medium. And telephone: for being the first medium to allow instant communication between people in different locations.
Mass communication?
The
concept of mass media was first introduced at the beginning of the 20th
century, but nowadays we simply talk about media. There are many reasons behind
that preference. On the one hand, the word “mass” suggests a shapeless tangle
of rootless, faceless individuals and implies a separation from a condescending
elite. On the other hand, it’s a concept born in an industrial context, tied to
a serial production model that no longer can be applied to media and society.
The
term “mass” is viewed currently as scientifically vague, no one can identify
what the mass really is or what can be said about it. But what’s more
important, the offer is so fragmented nowadays that media can’t attract a
massive part of the audience. A show might have a very broad audience and very
good ratings, but we certainly can’t speak about a mass anymore.